Bookmark


  • Page views 391
  • PDF Downloads 64


ISSN: 2766-2276
Environmental Sciences . 2022 October 17;3(10):1185-1188. doi: 10.37871/jbres1576.

 |   |   | 


open access journal Mini Review

Use of Nanotechnology for the Removal of Agrochemicals from Soil and Water

Ochoa LG1 and Balderrama Carmona AP2*

1Department of Water and Environment Sciences, Technological Institute of Sonora, 818 South, Colonia Centro C.P. 85000, Obregon City, Sonora, Mexico
2Department of Chemical-Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Sonora, Southern Regional Unit. Blvd. Lázaro Cárdenas 100, Colonia Francisco Villa C.P. 85880, Navojoa, Sonora, Mexico
*Corresponding author: Balderrama Carmona AP, Department of Chemical-Biological and Agricultural Sciences, University of Sonora, Southern Regional Unit. Blvd. Lázaro Cárdenas 100, Colonia Francisco Villa C.P. 85880, Navojoa, Sonora, Mexico E-mail:
Received: 10 October 2022 | Accepted: 15 October 2022 | Published: 17 October 2022
How to cite this article: Ochoa LG, Balderrama Carmona AP. Use of Nanotechnology for the Removal of Agrochemicals from Soil and Water. 2022 Oct 17; 3(10): 1185-1188. doi: 10.37871/jbres1576, Article ID: jbres1576
Copyright:© 2022 Ochoa LG, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.

Agrochemical contamination is a severe problem that damages the ecosystem and reduces the quality of life of the people exposed; to remedy this problem, nanotechnology is an attractive bioremediation alternative for these types of chemicals. This study emphasizes bioremediation actions such as investing in alternatives, for example, the method of photocatalysis using Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and Zinc Oxide (ZnO), and alternatives that aid in the degradation of most chemicals such as sonolyisis or ozonolysis to improve their effectiveness are of great interest. In this paper, the uses of nano remediation to reduce the effects of chemicals in agricultural soil were reviewed and its use is highly recommended.

Chemical substances from agricultural soil and water are a known problem for several years ago in the entire world. The excessive and inappropriate use of synthetic agrochemicals to increase the yield of crops leads to the deterioration of soil health, the degradation of agroecosystems, causes problems related to environmental insects, and phytopathogenic microorganisms [1]. Nanotechnology opens a wide range of opportunities in agriculture to produce agricultural products, which will increase food yields in an environmentally sustainable manner [2]. Implementing the use of nanotechnology in the agricultural field is considered important because it offers benefits in improving the quality and safety of food throughout the stages of its production, perfecting the use of production optimizing the use of agro-food contact with pathogens and toxins, and accelerating their detection in the food [3]. The acceleration of progress in agriculture has made the use of nanotechnology in the form of smart food packaging, breeding of varieties using gene nanocarriers, as well as in the synthesis of nanomaterials a routine procedure.

Environmental technology makes use of nanotechnology handled under the name of nanoremediation, this is used to protect the environment for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites [4,5]. The principal contaminants present in agricultural soil and water matrixes are pesticides, heavy metals coming from erosion, mineralization degradation of organics from agrochemicals, and proximity to mining sectors [6], inclusive of another contaminant present in irrigation water such as dyes [7]. Health needs to remove these materials as these can cause food poisoning and other diseases such as developing cancer, kidney damage, and among many other health problems [8].

According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the contamination by chemicals like persistent organic pollutants (POPs) [9] and heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, Cu, Co, Zn, Cr, Ni, As) mainly derived from the mining [10], energy sector, transportation sector, wastewater and the application of agrochemicals as pesticides which to this day the exact amount of damage to the environment and human health cannot be quantified are a threat to the environment [11]. Therefore, nanoremediation as an alternative to soil treatment is necessary to avoid further damage to the environment.

Nano remediation in situ has different advantages as reduces overall cost, reduces the cleanup time for contaminated sites, can be used on a large scale, discard the need to treat the contaminated soil, and reduces chemical concentrations until reaching almost complete elimination [12]. This paper briefly reviewed the use of nanotechnology for the removal of chemical substances from agricultural soil and water.

Nanomaterials (NM) have properties that favor chemical reduction and catalysis to mitigate pollutants, these properties of NM allow them to be used in situ in water and soil matrixes (Figure 1). For example, Nanoparticles (NPs) can fit into small spaces and spread more rapidly than larger particles, although, they cannot move far from the point of injection [13]. For nanoremediation to be effective, adequate characterization of the sites is needed: location, geological conditions (composition of the soil matrix, porosity, and depth of surface), proprietary red potted (porosity and depth of the water table), crop, the concentration of nitrates, nitrites, and sulfates), as well as the concentration and type of pollutants. These variables will determine if the NPs will be able to infiltrate the area to be remediated and if the conditions are favorable for the transformation of contaminants. Various materials have been tested for remediation, for example, zeolites, metal oxides, noble metals (silver, palladium, copper), titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes, fibers, and enzymes. However, the most widely used is zero-valence iron [14].

NPs that are activated by light are cheap and can be produced in massive quantities, as well as being slightly toxic; NPs such as Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and Zinc Oxide (ZnO), which are semiconductors with a wide bandgap, are highly studied for removing contaminants in polluted sites [15,16]. For example, ZnO nanoparticles are capable of sensing on the one hand, and photocatalysis the destruction of dangerous polychlorinated phenols on the other. There is a great interest in manipulating the surface of these particles with organic and inorganic pigments or dyes to have not only response in the UV but also in the visible spectrum and in this way, making photocatalysis more efficient for the transformation of pollutants in the environment [17]. Keep in mind that only 5% of the solar radiation that reaches the earth's surface is in the UV range. Several types of NPs designed to reduce pesticide application and degradation and supply micronutrients, control pathogens and increase crop yields are currently being considered in NM sciences [17]. Veerakumar, et al. [18] used palladium and silver nanoparticles embedded in ZnO nanostars for photocatalytic degradation of pendimethalin and trifluralin, on the other hand, Sangami and Manu [19] showed the efficacy of amethrin removal by using Fe nanoparticles used as a Fenton-type catalyst. Rani, et al. [20] concluded that degradation by sonolysis at 20 kHz, ozonation, photolysis at 254 nm, and photocatalysis using TiO2 and zero-valent Fe nanoparticles as adsorbents can remove most organochlorine herbicides (Table 1).

Table 1: Photocatalytic nanoparticles for removal of various compounds from soil and water.
NPs Pollutants removed Matrix References
TiO2 Heavy metals, pesticides Soil [21]
TiO2/fly ash Heavy metals, pesticides Water [22]
ZnO Heavy metals, insecticides Water [23]
CdS Dyes Water [24]
CdS/ ZnS Heavy metals Water [25]
CdS/ZnS-mBet Heavy metals Water [26]
MgO/WO3 Heavy metals Water [27]

For a long time, biotechnology has been applied to soil remediation and the use of bacteria and fungi for the degradation of pesticides has been successfully explored [28]. The nano-encapsulation of enzymes of bacterial origin were proposed to improve this technology; the nanocapsules stabilize, protect, and immobilize the enzymes, promoting enzymatic activity [29]. It has also proved that the nanocapsules are then easily degraded by soil microorganisms [30]. NPs have also been proven effective for soil remediation; such is the case of nano-iron NPs that have been shown to remove organic pesticides from the soil with an efficiency of 25-100% [31]. On the other hand, of even greater efficacy are the metal-organic NPs that have also been used for water remediation [32].

Pesticides in water are a public health risk, that's why their removal is necessary, however, conventional physicochemical methods are expensive and difficult to apply and some leave polluting residues that must also be cleaned [33]. An original solution is the use of bioadsorbent nanomaterials for the removal of organic contaminants [34], NPs have also been implemented, such as the case of ZnO NPs, synthesized by green chemistry, which can remove up to 99% of water herbicides [35].

The use of nanoparticles is a practical possibility for the removal of agrochemicals, however, the suggested methodologies for degradation are not yet used commercially, in addition, studies on the toxicity of nanomaterials in the environment and their degradation are still lacking, and it expected that the creation of innovative technologies and the boom in these findings will allow that soon the degradation of pollutants of any origin will be using nanomaterials.

We thank the Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences (2766-2276) for the invitation to publish this brief review.

  1. Cicek S, Nadaroglu H. The use of nanotechnology in the agriculture. Advances in nano research. 2015;3(4):207-223.
  2. Maluin FN, Hussein MZ, Nik Ibrahim NN, Wayayok A, Hashim N. Some emerging opportunities of nanotechnology development for soilless and Microgreen Farming. Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1213.
  3. Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A. Nanotechnology in agro-food: From field to plate. Food Research International. 2015;69:381-400.
  4. Hussain A, Rehman F, Rafeeq H, Waqas M, Asghar A, Afsheen N, Rahdar A, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN. In-situ, Ex-situ, and nano-remediation strategies to treat polluted soil, water, and air - A review. Chemosphere. 2022 Feb;289:133252. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133252. Epub 2021 Dec 10. PMID: 34902385.
  5. Sabarwal A, Kumar K, Singh RP. Hazardous effects of chemical pesticides on human health-Cancer and other associated disorders. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;63:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 1. PMID: 30199797.
  6. Wu J, Song J, Li W, Zheng M. The accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural land and the associated potential ecological risks in Shenzhen, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(2):1428-40. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5303-z. Epub 2015 Sep 15. PMID: 26370814.
  7. Tkaczyk A, Mitrowska K, Posyniak A. Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 15;717:137222. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137222. Epub 2020 Feb 10. PMID: 32084689.
  8. Geo 4: Global environment outlook: Environment for development. Nairobi: UNEP; 2007.
  9. Alharbi OML, Basheer AA, Khattab RA, Ali I. Health and environmental effects of persistent organic pollutants. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2018;263:442-453.
  10. Jaiswal A, Verma A, Jaiswal P. Detrimental Effects of Heavy Metals in Soil, Plants, and Aquatic Ecosystems and in Humans. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2018;37(3):183-197. doi: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.2018025348. PMID: 30317970.
  11. Fakayode S, Onianwa P. Heavy metal contamination of soil, and bioaccumulation in Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) around Ikeja Industrial Estate, Lagos, Nigeria.  Environmental Geology. 2002;43:145-150.
  12. Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M. Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: A review of the benefits and potential risks. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2009;117(12):1813-1831.
  13. Brewer A, Dror I, Berkowitz B. The mobility of plastic nanoparticles in aqueous and Soil Environments: A critical review. ACS ES&T Water. 2020;1(1):48–57.
  14. Truskewycz A, Patil S, Ball A, Shukla R. Iron nanoparticles for contaminated site remediation and environmental preservation. Nanobiotechnology. 2018;323-373.
  15. Javed R, Ain Nul, Gul A, Arslan Ahmad M, Guo W, Ao Q, et al. Diverse biotechnological applications of multifunctional titanium dioxide nanoparticles: An up‐to‐date review. IET Nanobiotechnology. 2022;16(5):171-189.
  16. Etacheri V, Di Valentin C, Schneider J, Bahnemann D, Pillai SC. Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: Advances in theory and experiments. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2015;25:1-29.
  17. Xu ZP. Material Nanotechnology is sustaining modern agriculture. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology. 2022;2(2):232-239.
  18. Veerakumar P, Sangili A, Saranya K, Pandikumar A, Lin K-C. Palladium, and silver nanoparticles embedded on zinc oxide nanostars for photocatalytic degradation of pesticides and herbicides. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;410:128434.
  19. Sangami S, Manu B. Synthesis of green iron nanoparticles using laterite and their application as a Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of Herbicide Ametryn in water. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2017;8:150-163.
  20. Rani M, Shanker U, Jassal V. Recent strategies for removal and degradation of persistent & toxic organochlorine pesticides using nanoparticles: A review. J Environ Manage. 2017 Apr 1;190:208-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.068. Epub 2017 Jan 2. PMID: 28056354.
  21. Higarashi MM, Jardim WF. Remediation of pesticide contaminated soil using TiO2 mediated by Solar Light. Catalysis Today. 2002;76(2-4):201-207.
  22. Visa M, Duta A. TiO2/fly ash novel substrate for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and surfactants. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2013;223:860-868.
  23. Le AT, Pung SY, Sreekantan S, Matsuda A, Huynh DP. Mechanisms of removal of heavy metal ions by ZnO particles. Heliyon. 2019 Apr 6;5(4):e01440. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01440. PMID: 31008388; PMCID: PMC6454208.
  24. Senasu T, Nanan S. Photocatalytic performance of CdS nanomaterials for photodegradation of organic azo dyes under artificial visible light and natural solar light irradiation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2017;28(23):17421-17441.
  25. Amiri O, Hosseinpour-Mashkani SM, Mohammadi Rad M, Abdvali F. Sonochemical synthesis and characterization of CdS/ZnS core-shell nanoparticles and application in removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution. Superlattices and Microstructures. 2014;66:67-75.
  26. Wang M, Yao H, Zhang L, Zhou X. Synthesis of highly-efficient photocatalyst for visible- light-driven hydrogen evolution by recycling of heavy metal ions in wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020;383:121149. 
  27. Uko CA, Tijani JO, Abdulkareem SA, Mustapha S, Egbosiuba TC, Muzenda E. Adsorptive properties of MgO/WO3 nanoadsorbent for selected heavy metals removal from indigenous dyeing wastewater. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2022;162:775-794.
  28. Singh BK. Exploring microbial diversity for biotechnology: The way forward. Trends in Biotechnology. 2010;28(3):111–6. 
  29. Singh BK. Organophosphorus-degrading bacteria: ecology and industrial applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Feb;7(2):156-64. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2050. Epub 2008 Dec 22. PMID: 19098922.
  30. Chauhan R, Yadav HOS, Sehrawat N. Nano bioremediation: A new and a versatile tool for sustainable environmental cleanup-Overview. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences. 2020;11(4):564-573.
  31. Rajput VD, Minkina T, Upadhyay SK, Kumari A, Ranjan A, Mandzhieva S, Sushkova S, Singh RK, Verma KK. Nanotechnology in the Restoration of Polluted Soil. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;12(5):769. doi: 10.3390/nano12050769. PMID: 35269257; PMCID: PMC8911862.
  32. Shad S, Bashir N, Belinga-Desaunay Nault M-F, Lynch I. Incorporation of biogenic zinc nanoparticles into a polymeric membrane: Impact on the capture of organic herbicides. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2021;5:100339.
  33. Shamsollahi Z, Partovinia A. Recent advances on pollutants removal by rice husk as a bio-based adsorbent: A critical review. J Environ Manage. 2019 Sep 15;246:314-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.145. Epub 2019 Jun 8. PMID: 31185318.
  34. Okoro HK, Pandey S, Ogunkunle CO, Ngila CJ, Zvinowanda C, Jimoh I, et al. Nanomaterial-based bio sorbents: Adsorbent for efficient removal of selected organic pollutants from industrial wastewater. Emerging Contaminants. 2022;8:46-58.
  35. Li Q, Chen X, Zhuang J, Chen X. Decontaminating soil organic pollutants with manufactured nanoparticles. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(12):11533-48. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6255-7. Epub 2016 Feb 24. PMID: 26906002.

✨ Call for Preprints Submissions

Are you the author of a recent Preprint? We invite you to submit your manuscript for peer-reviewed publication in our open access journal.
Benefit from fast review, global visibility, and exclusive APC discounts.

Submit Now   Archive
?