Bookmark


  • Page views 401
  • PDF Downloads 74


ISSN: 2766-2276
Medicine Group. 2023 November 23;4(11):1586-1596. doi: 10.37871/jbres1834.

 |   |   | 


open access journal Research Article

Knowledge and Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services Among Female Undergraduates at FUTO

Cynthia Nwachukwu1, Nneka Eleanor Asuzu1, David Chinaecherem Innocent1*, Chiagoziem Ogazirilem Emerole1, Uzochukwu Godswill Ekeleme1, Ugonma Winnie Dozie1, John Chigozie Ekenze2, Rejoicing Chijindum Innocent3, Ihuoma Chimdimma Dike1, Uchechukwu Olive Iwuagwau1, Ejiro Akpevba4, Ali A Rabaan5-7, Promise Chinemerem Innocent8 and Increase Praise Innocent9

1Department of Public Health, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Imo State, 460114, Nigeria
2Department of Optometry, Imo State University, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria
3Department of Pharmacy, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria
4Department of Optometry, University of Benin, Edo State, Nigeria
5Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
6College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
7Department of Public Health and Nutrition, University of Haripur, Haripur 22610, Pakistan
8Department of Microbiology, Imo State University Owerri, Imo state Nigeria
9Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Imo State, 460114, Nigeria
*Corresponding author: David Chinaecherem Innocent, Department of Public Health, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Imo State, 460114, Nigeria E-mail:
Received: 03 November 2023 | Accepted: 20 November 2023 | Published: 23 November 2023
How to cite this article: Nwachukwu C, Asuzu NE, Innocent DC, Emerole CO, Ekeleme UG, Dozie UW, Ekenze JC, Innocent RC, Dike IC, Iwuagwau UO, Akpevba E, Rabaan AA, Innocent PC, Innocent IP. Knowledge and Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services Among Female Undergraduates at FUTO. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023 Nov 23; 4(11): 1586-1596. doi: 10.37871/jbres1757, Article ID: jbres1757
Copyright:© 2023 Nwachukwu C, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.
Keywords
  • Cancer
  • Cervical cancer
  • Knowledge
  • Utilization
  • Cervical cancer screening
  • Female students

Background: Globally, cervical cancer is the fourth most common is a type of cancer in women. It that starts in the cervix. The cervix is a hollow cylinder that connects the lower part of a woman’s uterus to her vagina. Cervical cancer is a leading cause of mortality particularly in young women. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri.

Methods: A descriptive cross sectional research design was adopted for this study. A multi stage sampling technique was used in recruiting a total of 374 female students that participated in this study and a pretested questionnaire was used in the data collection of the study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used in the analysis of the study.

Results: The study showed that, 46.3% (173) of the respondents aged 15-24. From the study, majority of the respondents 85.8% (321) had heard about cervical cancer screening. Most of the respondents 81.9% (306) affirmed they would utilize cervical cancer screening if offered a chance. A good number of the respondents 33.95% (127), mentioned that opined “distance to facility” as one of the factors that influenced the utilization of cervical cancer screening services. Further results from the study based on the relationship between Socio-demographic characteristics and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening services demonstrated that there was a statistically significant relationship between age (p = 0.0035), academic level (p = 0.0023), healthcare plan (p = 0.0327) and level of knowledge of cervical cancer.

Conclusion: The study concluded that, while many female undergraduates had a good understanding of cervical cancer screening, this did not translate into a propensity to utilize screening services. From the study, it was recommended that, female undergraduates must have a thorough understanding of cervical cancer and how to prevent it.

Cervical cancer is a type of cancer that starts in the cervix [1]. The cervix is a hollow cylinder that connects the lower part of a woman’s uterus to her vagina [2]. Most cervical cancers begin in cells on the surface of the cervix. As one of the leading causes of mortality among women, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in developing countries [2]. In addition, cervical cancer has a relatively early onset, occurring primarily during reproductive ages, and is one of the three most common cancers among women under the age of 45 in most countries [3]. Cervical cancer is primarily caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection, which has been identified as a primary risk factor for cervical carcinogenesis [1]. Efforts to reduce this risk have resulted in the development of cervical cancer vaccines that target specific HPV strains, reducing the incidence of precancerous lesions significantly [3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of total cervical cancer control, advocating for critical practices such as vaccination, screening, and treatment [1].

A recent study posited that mortality from cervical cancer varies in different geographic regions [4]. The mortality due to cervical cancer is high worldwide, mainly because of the absence of a functioning screening process and the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis [5]. (South African HPV advisory board, 2010). About 527,624 women are already diagnosed with cervical cancer, and 265,672 die from the disease annually [6]. About 87% of all deaths from cervical cancer occur in sub-Saharan African countries. The age-standardized incidence rate for cervical cancer is much lower in developed countries at 5.0 per 100,000 compared to developing countries at 8.0 per 100,000 [7].

According to several studies, the mortality rate for cervical cancer is lower in developed nations at 2.2 per 100,000 compared with developing nations at 4.3 per 100,000 [2,7,8]. An important strategy towards reducing the incidence and mortality associated with cervical cancer is to increase the screening rate of women who have not screened or those who screen infrequently [9]. Knowledge about cancer of the cervix and its screening is important for screening uptake. Women with low levels of knowledge about cervical cancer and its prevention are less likely to access screening services [10]. Female health workers have shown good knowledge of cervical cancer, however, cervical cancer screening attendance rates are still far from satisfactory in most countries [11].

Despite its proven importance, rates of attendance for screening programmes vary widely and are considerably low [3,12-14]. The low prevalence of early cervical cancer screening and limited access to its treatments are largely attributed to differences in diagnosis and subsequent mortality from the disease among high- and low-income countries. For instance, the screening uptake for cervical cancer in the three developing regions was only 6%, 12%, and 8.3% in South Africa, Bhutan, and Nigeria, respectively [15]. An important strategy towards the reduction of its burden in a developing country is early diagnosis and management of the premalignant lesions of the disease, this would be achieved via screening of women at risk [16,17]. Cervical cancer screening services among undergraduates in tertiary institutions are imperative, and cervical cancer usually develops slowly, which means that most cases can be identified and managed when screening is performed regularly [18]. Cervical cancer knowledge is important because it is one of the most easily preventable forms of female cancer if early screening and diagnosis are made. Low awareness level about the disease and its risk factors, beliefs about the disease, poor access to preventive services, unaffordability of the service, and the current health service system can all affect the decision to seek health care services for cervical cancer [19].

Worldwide, it has been posited by several studies that cervical cancer is preventable and curable if detected early enough and treated correctly [2,14,15,20]. Cervical cancer is a leading cause of mortality, particularly in young women [12]. The knowledge of young school girls about cervical cancer screening is a problem, and there is a need to determine what factors might be influencing the utilization of these screening services. In Nigeria, undergraduates are faced with various choices. Young women engaging in early detection screening services is imperative, but studies show that several factors hamper it [15,21]. A global estimate of 500,000 diagnoses of cervical cancer cases are reported each year, and 250,000 women die from cervical cancer [22]. This knowledge and utilization of seeking health care among women with cervical cancer limits treatment options, hence low survival estimates: 60% of patients die within the first year after diagnosis and about 80% die within the first 2 years [23]. In spite of this, there is still a paucity of information on the knowledge and uptake of these services among female undergraduates in Nigerian universities. Therefore, this research will provide insight into the various factors influencing the knowledge of female undergraduates and the utilization of cervical cancer screening services.

Study design and setting

A descriptive Cross-sectional Research design was used for this study on the knowledge and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri.

This study included only undergraduates of academic level 200-500level at federal university of technology Owerri who were present as at the time of the study.

This study excluded female undergraduates of academic level 200-500 level at federal university of technology Owerri who were said to be sick or were admitted at the Health center. The study excluded undergraduates of academic level 200-500 level who refused to give in their consent for the study.

Sampling size

The sample size was determined using the Taro and Yamene formula (1967) for sample size determination.

n = N

1+Ne2

where:

n is the desired sample size

N is the population size of Female Undergraduates (10,389)

e is margin of error at 5% = (0.05)

Therefore,

n = 392.30362210

Furthermore, to account for Non Response Rate, the sample size was increased by 10% = 0.10 = 392x 0.10 = 39.2≈40

n = 392 + 40 = 432

Sampling technique

A probability based multi-stage sampling procedure was employed to draw samples for the study

Stage 1: Selection of faculties

Simple random sampling was used to select three (3) Schools out of the nine (9) faculties in Federal University of Technology Owerri. Numbers were assigned to each faculty, folded and put in a basket, shuffled and three were picked one after the other without replacement to give every faculty an equal chance of selection.

Stage 2: Selection of departments

Simple random sampling was also used to select two (2) departments in each from the selected faculties making a total of six (6) departments. This was done via balloting to give every department an equal chance of selection.

Stage 3: Selection of levels

Students from second year and above across the selected departments were recruited for the study before utilizing a systematic random sampling to pick the respondents

Stage 4: Selection of respondents

In each of the selected departments, 72 respondents (432/6 = 21.8~72) were selected using systematic random sampling from the provided class list. This was done systematically to ensure that every participant has an equal chance of being selected.

Data collection

The instrument for data collection was a semi-structured questionnaire aimed to obtain relevant information on the knowledge and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri. The Data tool (Questionnaire) consisted of Five (5) sections as follows:

Section A: Consisted of information on the socio demographic characteristics of female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri.

Section B: Consisted of questions on the level of knowledge of female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri towards cervical cancer screening.

Section C: Consisted of Questions on the utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri.

Section D: Consisted of questions on the factors influencing the utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates at Federal University of Technology Owerri.

Reliability of the instrument was determined using test retest method. 40 copies of the questionnaire were given to some respondents outside the area of study by the researcher. This area for reliability testing was among female undergraduates at Imo state university. This area shared similar characteristics with the Federal University of Technology Owerri. Chrombach alpha test was used to test for the reliability of the questionnaire and a reliability coefficient of 0.81 was obtained. Data was obtained with the aid of Two (2) field assistants who were hired and trained to aid the researcher in the data collection process.

Data analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used in the analysis of the data gotten from the study. Results were expressed in percentages, frequencies, tables and charts (Descriptive Statistics). Chi Square Test was used to ascertain the association stated in the hypothesis (p = 0.05).

Ethical consideration

A letter of introduction and ethical clearance was obtained from the Department of Public Health Ethical clearance committee in Federal University of Technology Owerri (FUTO) before the research was conducted. The purpose of the research was explained to each respondent and verbal informed consent was obtained from them before inclusion into the study. Also, anonymity of the respondents was assured and ensured. The confidentiality of the information they give was also maintained.

Socio demographic characteristics of the female undergraduates

Table 1 below revealed that 46.3% (173) of the respondents aged 15-24, 30.1% (113) were 25-34 years of age, 14.5% (55) were aged 35-44 years, 1.62% (6) were between 45-49 years of age and none of the respondents were above 50 years of age. 68.9% (258) of the respondents were of Igbo ethnic group, 19.6% (73) included ethnicity not listed but label ‘others’, 10.5% (39) were Yoruba, and 1.0% (4) Hausa. 48.5% (182) of the respondents were Christians, 29.9% (112) of other religions not listed, 16.3% (61) were Muslims, and 5.2% (20) were Traditional. Concerning the academic levels of the participants, 24.2% (91) reported ‘300 l’, 21.9% (82) 400 l, 21.2% (79) 200 l, 19.2% (72) 500 l, and 13.4% (50) 100 l. 26.5% (99) of the female undergraduates reported their parents/care givers had attained secondary education levels, 27.8% (104) tertiary, 21.8% (82) ‘others’, 19.8% (74) attained primary level of education, and 4.0% (15) of the respondents reported their parents had no formal education. 34.9% (131) of the undergraduate females reported ‘others’ when asked concerning the occupation of their parents/care givers, 20.1% (75) civil servants, 17.5% (66) of the respondents had guardians/parents who were self-employed, 14.1% (53) Professionals, 7.2% (27) unemployed, and 6.1% (23) Artisans. 47.2% (177) of the respondents reportedly lived with their parents at home, 35.8% (134) with family friends, and 16.8% (63) lived alone. While 78.6% (294) of the respondents resided off campus, 21.4% (80) lived in the school hostel. 64.1% (240) of the participants affirmed they had a healthcare plan at a health facility, while 35.9% (134) did not.

Table 1: Socio demographic characteristics of the female undergraduates.
Characteristics Frequency
(n = 374)
Percentage (%)
Age    
15-24 173 46.3
25-34 113 30.1
35-44 55 14.5
45-49 6 1.62
50 and Above 00 0
Total 374 100
Ethnicity
Igbo 258 68.9
Hausa/Fulani 4 1.0
Yoruba 39 10.5
Others 73 19.6
Total 374 100
Religion
Christianity 182 48.5
Muslim 61 16.3
Traditional 20 5.2
Others 112 29.9
Total 374 100
Academic level
100L 50 13.4
200L 79 21.2
300L 91 24.2
400L 82 21.9
500L 72 19.2
Total 374 100
Parents/care givers educational qualification
No formal education 15 4.0
Primary 74 19.8
Secondary 99 26.5
Tertiary 104 27.8
Others 82 21.8
Total 374 100
Occupation of parents/Caregiver
Artisan e.g Carpenter, Barber, Tailor, Driver 23 6.1
Civil servant e.g Teacher 75 20.1
Self-employed e.g Trader, Photographer 66 17.5
Unemployed 27 7.2
Professionals e.g. Doctor, Nurse, 53 14.1
Others 131 34.9
Total 374 100
Who do you live with at home?
Parents 177 47.2
Family friends 134 35.8
Myself 63 16.8
Total 374 100
Where do you reside in school?
Off campus 294 78.6
School Hostel 80 21.4
Total 374 100
Do you have a health care plan at any health facility?
Yes 240 64.1
No 134 35.9
Total 374 100
Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates

Demonstrated in table 2, majority of the respondents 85.8% (321) had heard about cervical cancer screening, while 14.2% (53) denied. For example (Figure 1), 25.4% (82) listed ‘social media’ as their source of information on cervical cancer screening, 19.3% (62) said “health practitioners”, 19.2% (61) listed ‘other’ sources, 12.4% (40) reported ‘school’, 12.0% (38) said “parents/family”, 10.1% (32) reported TV/Radio programs, and 1.6% (5) said “Newspaper/Magazines”. 53.0% (198) of the female undergraduates affirmed family history of cervical cancer is a risk for cervical cancer, while 47.0% (176) said “No”. 58.0% (217) also accepted cervical cancer is diagnosed with Pap smear, however 42.0% (157) did not agree. 57.1% (213) obliged that digital cervix examination is used for cervical cancer screening, and 42.9% (161) reported disagreement. While 36.9% (138) of the respondents affirmed that cervical cancer is higher among undergraduates in developing countries, 63.1% (236) said “No”.

Table 2: Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates.          
Variables Frequency
(n = 374)
Percentage (%)
Have you heard about cervical cancer screening?    
Yes 321 85.8
No 53 14.2
Total 374 100
What is your source of information?    
School 40 12.4
Parents/Family 38 12.0
Social Media 82 25.4
TV/Radio programs 32 10.1
Health Practitioners 62 19.3
Newspaper/Magazines 5 1.6
Others 61 19.2
Total 321 100
Family history of cervical cancer is a risk for cervical cancer    
Yes 198 53.0
No 176 47.0
Total 374 100
Cervical Cancer is diagnosed with Pap smear    
Yes 217 58.0
No 157 42.0
Total 374 100
Digital cervix examination is used for cervical cancer screening    
Yes 213 57.1
No 161 42.9
Total 374 100
Cervical cancer is higher among undergraduates in developing countries    
Yes 138 36.9
No 236 63.1
Total 374 100
Level of utilization of cervical cancer screening

From table 3, majority of the respondents 81.9% (306) affirmed they would utilize cervical cancer screening if offered a chance, while 18.0% (68) did not accept. 65.3% (244) of the respondents affirmed they had been advised by a physician to screen for cervical cancer, while 34.7% (130) replied “No”. Additionally, 43.5% (163) replied ‘Yes’ when asked if they had screened for cervical cancer prior to the time of this study, while 56.5% (211) reported they had not. 32.1% (52) of the respondents who said “Yes” reported duration to be less than a month, 26.2% (43) between 6months to a year, 25.6% (42) said “4-6 months”, 10.0% (16) said “2-3 months”, and 6.1% (10) reported longer than a year. Reasons for the screening included responses such as, “Just decided to go for the screening to save my life” 39.3% (64), 27.6% (45) ‘Presented with symptoms’, 16.6% (27) ‘for more long life’, 12.0% (20) of the respondents reported ‘Cancer cases in the family’, and 4.4% (7) listed other purposes. 20.3% (33) of the respondents affirmed they have had to deal with abnormal screening outcome, while 79.7% (130) said “No”.

Table 3: Level of utilization of cervical cancer screening.
Variable Frequency
(n = 374)
Percentage (%)
Would you utilize cervical cancer screening if offered a chance?    
Yes 306 81.9
No 68 18.0
Total 374 100
Have any physician advised you to screen for cervical cancer before?    
Yes 244 65.3
No 130 34.7
Total 374 100
Have you screened for cervical cancer before?    
Yes 163 43.5
No 211 56.5
Total 374 100
If YES when was that?    
Less than a month 52 32.1
2-3 months 16 10.0
4-6 months 42 25.6
6 months to a year 43 26.2
longer than a year 10 6.1
Total 163 100
What was your reason for the screening?    
Presented with symptoms 45 27.6
Cancer cases in the family 20 12.0
For more long life 27 16.6
Just decided to go for the screening to save my life 64 39.3
Others 7 4.4
Total 163 100
Have you ever had abnormal cervical cancer screening result before?    
Yes 33 20.3
No 130 79.7
Total 163 100
Factors that influences the utilization of cervical cancer screening services

From table 4, 33.95% (127) opined “distance to facility”, 20.06% (75) of the respondents reported possible factors influencing utility of cervical cancer screening to be ‘financial constraints’, 19.69% (74) ethnic factors, 19.78% (74) reported lack of information, and 6.53% (24) reported religious factors.

Table 4: Factors that influences the utilization of cervical cancer screening services.
Variable Frequency
(n = 374)
Percentage (%)
What are the possible factors influencing your utility of cervical cancer screening?
Financial Constraints 75 20.06
Distance to facility 127 33.95
Lack of Information 74 19.78
Religious Factors 24 6.53
Ethnic factors 74 19.69
Association between socio-demographic factors and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening services

Table 5 showed the results for the test of a statistically significant association between Socio-demographic characteristics of female undergraduates and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening in Federal University of Technology, Imo State, Nigeria (Figure 2). There was a statistically significant association between age of female undergraduates and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening at FUTO (p = 0.0035). Given the association between academic level of female undergraduates and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in the study population, there was a significant relationship (p = 0.0023). On the hypothesis between parent’s educational qualification and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in primal population, there was no statistically significant association (p = 0.1686). Given the association between place of residence of female undergraduates and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening in the study population, there was no statistically significant association (p = 0.920). Finally, there was a statistically significant association between healthcare plan and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening in the study population (p = 0.0327).

Table 5: Association between the socio demographic factors and level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates.
Socio Demographics Level of Knowledge of CCSS X2 p-value Decision
Yes (%) No (%)
Age 84.8% 15.2% 12 0.0035 S
Academic Level 73.7% 26.3% 2.0 0.0023 S
Parents Educational Qualification 50.7% 49.3% 3.332 0.1686 NS
Place of Residence 55.8% 44.2% 8.57 0.920 NS
Healthcare Plan 70.1% 29.9% 17 0.0327 S
Association between Level of knowledge towards cervical cancer screening services and utilization of cervical cancer screening services

Table 6 showed the results for the test of a statistically significant association between knowledge of cervical cancer screening services and utilization of cervical cancer screening services. There was a statistically significant association between good knowledge and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female undergraduates (p = 0.00532)

Table 6: Association between level of knowledge towards cervical cancer screening services and utilization of cervical cancer screening services.
Utilization of CCSS Level of Knowledge of CCSS X2 p-value Decision
Good Knowledge Poor Knowledge
Yes 86.1% 13.9% 12.41 0.00532 Sig.
No 13.9% 86.1%
CCSS*: Cervical Cancer Screening Services; Sig: Significant

Based on the findings of this study on the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, it was revealed that 46.3% of the female undergraduates were in the age range of 15-24 years. This finding is consistent with a statement in a publication by Dozie UW, et al. [2] that female undergraduates in a cervical cancer survey conducted among participants in Lagos had a mean age of 20 years. Further findings of the study showed that the respondents' majority were Christians (48.5%) and of Igbo origin (68.9%). This could be due to the fact that the study was conducted in the south-eastern part of Nigeria, which is predominated by people of Igbo and Christian origin. Close to three-quarters of the female undergraduates in the study affirmed they had a healthcare plan at a health facility (64.1%). This finding is similar to a study conducted among female undergraduates in Lagos. 65% of the female undergraduates showed they registered a healthcare plan in facilities of interest. Gitonga E, et al. [24] suggested similar figures among medical personnel in an Ondo study by Bruni L, et al. [7].

Findings from this study were based on the level of knowledge about cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates at FUTO. ‘Yes’ responses received were 85.8% and 14.2% negative. This corroborates previous findings on the knowledge of cervical cancer screening. In the study, 25.4% of the female undergraduates listed ‘social media’ as their source of information on cervical cancer screening. This could be due to several media campaigns and awareness about cervical cancer. Additionally, 53.0% of the respondents correctly affirmed that a family history of cervical cancer is a risk for cervical cancer screening strategies. This is, however, in contrast with a study by Mlange R, et al. [25] conducted in Uganda. From this study, it was revealed that 58.0% of accepted cervical cancer is diagnosed with a pap smear. The efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has been highlighted in numerous studies, including Dozie UW, et al. [2] work, which highlights factors contributing to health-seeking delays in cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, Bekele HT, et al. [3] publications provide global estimates of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence, emphasising the global impact of HPV-related cancers, including cervical cancer. A publication by Dhendup J, et al. [15] revealed figures that demonstrated otherwise. Further investigation showed that 42.0% did not agree. This could be due to a lack of formal knowledge about cervical cancer screening. The female undergraduates also agreed that digital cervix examination is used for cervical cancer screening (57.1%), while 63.1% of the respondents refused that cervical cancer is more prevalent among undergraduates in developing countries. A survey conducted in Anambra is consistent with this observation by Tangjitgamol S, et al. [26].

The majority of the respondents, 81.9%, affirmed they would utilize cervical cancer screening if offered a chance, and 65.3% of the female undergraduates had been well-advised by a physician to screen for cervical cancer. The high positive turnout could be owed to medical practitioners formally and informally sensitizing patients to the importance of cervical cancer screening. Although 43.5% had been screened for cervical cancer prior to the time of this study, further findings revealed that 56.5% had not. This finding could be due to several factors, such as ‘distance to facility’ (33.9%), financial constraints (20.0%), and ethnic factors (19.6%). A previous study by Tawiah A, et al. [8] suggested undergraduates did not undergo cervical cancer screening because ‘they lacked time’ (25.7%), followed by ‘lack of confidence in the procedure’ (33.2%).

This study revealed that 32.1% of the female undergraduates had last been screened in less than a month. This also expresses good knowledge of cervical cancer screenings among the respondents. The findings of the study further revealed that 39.3% of the female undergraduates took cervical cancer screenings ‘just to save’ their lives. This goes in line with a study by Dykens JA, et al. [12] on the level of knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screenings. This could be due to a fear of the terminal effects of uncontrolled cancer.

Another study by NCI (2014) corroborates this finding that 16.6% of undergraduates who underwent cervical cancer screenings did it because they wanted to 'stay alive longer’. The results of this study on the association between socio-demographic characteristics and respondents' level of knowledge about cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in FUTO revealed that age is significantly associated with respondents' level of knowledge about cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates (p = 0.0035). In comparison to younger undergraduates, older age groups indicated superior knowledge of cervical cancer screening. This is consistent with a study by Behnamfar F, et al. [27], which revealed that respondents' age was related to their level of knowledge of cervical cancer screening (p = 0.0041). Further research into the study revealed that respondents' academic level is also substantially connected with their knowledge of cervical cancer screening (p = 0.0023). This contradicts a report issued by Bruni L, et al. [28], which found no meaningful link. This suggests that as students' academic levels advanced, so did their understanding of cervical cancer screening. In comparison to 100 students, 500 students explained a greater comprehension of CCS. This could be due to increased access to information as a result of years of research. Also, according to the findings of a study among female undergraduates in Imo, there was no significant relationship between respondents' parents’ educational qualifications and their degree of knowledge about cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in the study group (p = 0.1686). The study found that even though some respondents' parents or guardians had minimal formal education, they still had a strong understanding of CCS. Mlange R, et al. [25] back up this claim in their research. There was no significant relationship between female undergraduates' place of residence and their level of knowledge of cervical cancer screening (p = 0.920). This is in line with a prior study conducted by... This indicates that undergraduates' living quarters did not improve their ability to understand CSS. This study found a link between having a healthcare plan in a healthcare facility and having a high degree of knowledge about cervical cancer screening (p = 0.0327). This is supported by a previous study by Mwaka AD, et al. [29]. Findings of this study showed an association between knowledge of cervical cancer screening services and utilisation of cervical cancer screening services (p = 0.00532). This suggests that well-informed female students understand the importance and are more likely to seek cervical cancer screening than those who were uninformed. This is supported by a study by Saghari S, et al. [30].

Age, academic level, and healthcare plan were all associated with the level of knowledge of female students towards cervical cancer screening in this study. The findings of this study revealed that while many female undergraduates had a good understanding of cervical cancer screening, this did not translate into a propensity to utilize screening services. This study underlines the need for the state health system to address perceived hurdles and common misconceptions, promote campaigns, and develop health policies to encourage female undergraduates in Imo State to undergo cervical cancer screening. The study recommends the following:

  • Female undergraduates must have a thorough understanding of cervical cancer and how to prevent it.
  • Accessibility to screening facilities must be improved.
  • Awareness campaigns must provide accurate information so that female undergraduates can make informed choices.
  • If cervical cancer is discovered, the importance and effectiveness of screening and treatment must be emphasized. As a result, information is critical, but it must be supplemented with prescriptive information on how to take preventative action.
Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data set from the study are available to the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

Authors have declared that they have no competing interests.

  1. World Health Organization. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice, 2nd ed. 2016.
  2. Dozie UW, Ezeala OV, David CI, Dozie KCN, Chukwuocha UM, Iwuala CC, Osuoji NJ, Okoro CC, Chukwu OR, Eneh SC, Dozie INS. Factors associated with health seeking delay in the screening of cervical cancer among women in Imo state, south Eastern Nigeria. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023 Sep 29;37:100765. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100765. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37806167.
  3. Bekele HT, Nuri A, Abera L. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors Among College and University Female Students in Dire Dawa City, Eastern Ethiopia. Cancer Inform. 2022 Apr 8;21:11769351221084808. doi: 10.1177/11769351221084808. PMID: 35418740; PMCID: PMC8998372.
  4. Arulogun OS, Maxwell OO. Perception and utilization of cervical cancer screening services among female nurses in University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;11:69. Epub 2012 Apr 15. PMID: 22655103; PMCID: PMC3361207.
  5. Niyonsenga G, Gishoma D, Sego R, Uwayezu MG, Nikuze B, Fitch M, Igiraneza PC. Knowledge, utilization and barriers of cervical cancer screening among women attending selected district hospitals in Kigali - Rwanda. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2021 Jul 1;31(3):266-274. doi: 10.5737/23688076313266274. PMID: 34395829; PMCID: PMC8320790.
  6. Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch F, De S. Human Papillomavirus And Related Diseases Report: Ico HPV Information Centre. 2017.
  7. Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas G, Albero U.  Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Kazakhstan Tech Rep. Ico Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Barcelona, Spain. 2014.
  8. Tawiah A, Konney TO, Dassah ET, Visser LE, Amo-Antwi K, Appiah-Kubi A, Bell SG, Johnston C, Lawrence ER. Determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women with access to free screening: A community-based study in peri-urban Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;159(2):513-521. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14158. Epub 2022 Mar 14. PMID: 35212393.
  9. Gerstl S, Lee L, Nesbitt RC, Mambula C, Sugianto H, Phiri T, Kachingwe J, Llosa AE. Cervical cancer screening coverage and its related knowledge in southern Malawi. BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12547-9. PMID: 35164716; PMCID: PMC8842862.
  10. Mafiana JJ, Dhital S, Halabia M, Wang X. Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Nigeria: a systematic review. Afr Health Sci. 2022 Jun;22(2):295-309. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.33. PMID: 36407354; PMCID: PMC9652621.
  11. Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, Alemany L, Cowan M, Herrero R, Poljak M, Murillo R, Broutet N, Riley LM, de Sanjose S. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Aug;10(8):e1115-e1127. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00241-8. Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jul;11(7):e1011. PMID: 35839811; PMCID: PMC9296658.
  12. Dykens JA, Smith JS, Demment M, Marshall E, Schuh T, Peters K, Irwin T, McIntosh S, Sy A, Dye T. Evaluating the implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings globally: a systematized review. Cancer Causes Control. 2020 May;31(5):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01290-4. Epub 2020 Mar 17. PMID: 32185604; PMCID: PMC7105425.
  13. Tarney CM, Han J. Postcoital bleeding: a review on etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:192087. doi: 10.1155/2014/192087. Epub 2014 Jun 17. PMID: 25045355; PMCID: PMC4086375.
  14. Aredo MA, Sendo EG, Deressa JT. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among women attending maternal health services at Aira Hospital, West Wollega, Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2021 Sep 27;9:20503121211047063. doi: 10.1177/20503121211047063. PMID: 34603728; PMCID: PMC8481706.
  15. Dhendup J, Tshering U. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Harrison TR, editor. 17th ed. New York:  Mcgraw-Hill Medical: 2014. pp. 608-609.
  16. Dozie UW, Benjamin WI, Innocent DC, Anyanwu EC, Chukwuocha UM, Innocent RC, Dike IC, Akpevba E, Rabaan AA, Okorie MO. Knowledge, acceptability and willingness to receive HPV vaccine among women in Owerri municipal Imo state. Academic Journal of Health Sciences. 2024;39(2):37-45. doi: 10.3306/AJHS.2024.39.02.37.
  17. Ramathebane MM, Sooro MA, Kabuya RM, Sayed AR. Knowledge and attitudes relating to cervical and breast cancer among women in Maseru, Lesotho. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Dec 14;14(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3459. PMID: 36546486; PMCID: PMC9772699.
  18. Gebisa T, Bala ET, Deriba BS. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Attending Health Facilities in Central Ethiopia. Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221076680. doi: 10.1177/10732748221076680. PMID: 35315704; PMCID: PMC8943579.
  19. John-Akinola YO, Ndikom CM, Oluwasanu MM, Adebisi T, Odukoya O. Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Knowledge, Utilisation, Prevention Educational Interventions and Policy Response in Nigeria: A Scoping Review. Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221130180. doi: 10.1177/10732748221130180. PMID: 36168955; PMCID: PMC9523857.
  20. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. PMID: 25642554.
  21. Chinyere E, Anyanwu, Ogbonna PC, Innocent DC. Exploring the awareness level of cervical cancer concept among post-menopausal women in Ezinihitte Mbaise, Imo State, Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering. 2023;7(4):187-193.
  22. World Health Organization. Sexual and Reproductive Health: Cancer of the Cervix. 2012.
  23. Dulla D, Daka D, Wakgari N. Knowledge about cervical cancer screening and its practice among female health care workers in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2017 May 22;9:365-372. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S132202. PMID: 28579837; PMCID: PMC5446960.
  24. Gitonga E, Iseme R, Mutisya R, Kodhiambo M. Cervical cancer knowledge, awareness and related health behaviours amongst women of reproductive age in Kiambu County, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Oct 21;10(1):1056-1070. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2136184. PMID: 36299770; PMCID: PMC9590427.
  25. Mlange R, Matovelo D, Rambau P, Kidenya B. Patient and disease characteristics associated with late tumour stage at presentation of cervical cancer in northwestern Tanzania. BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jan 25;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0285-7. PMID: 26809986; PMCID: PMC4727267.
  26. Tangjitgamol S, Katanyoo K, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Manusirivithaya S, Supawattanabodee B. Adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 3;2014(12):CD010401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010401.pub2. PMID: 25470408; PMCID: PMC6402532.
  27. Behnamfar F, Azadehrah M. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer in Iran--a survey in Isfahan City. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(2):635-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.2.635. PMID: 25684499.
  28. Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch F, De Sanjose S. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases Report. Ico Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Ghana. 2016.
  29. Mwaka AD, Garimoi CO, Were EM, Roland M, Wabinga H, Lyratzopoulos G. Social, demographic and healthcare factors associated with stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer: cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in Northern Uganda. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 21;6(1):e007690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007690. PMID: 26801459; PMCID: PMC4735146.
  30. Saghari S, Ghamsary M, Marie-Mitchell A, Oda K, Morgan JW. Sociodemographic predictors of delayed- versus early-stage cervical cancer in California. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 26. PMID: 25794765.

✨ Call for Preprints Submissions

Are you the author of a recent Preprint? We invite you to submit your manuscript for peer-reviewed publication in our open access journal.
Benefit from fast review, global visibility, and exclusive APC discounts.

Submit Now   Archive
?