Bookmark


  • Page views 669
  • PDF Downloads 55


ISSN: 2766-2276
> Environmental Sciences. 2021 October 30;2(10):1059-1066. doi: 10.37871/jbres1348.

 |   |   | 


open access journal Research Article

How the Chaos Theory is Defeated in the Yabu Meteorological Station, Cuba

Ricardo Oses Rodriguez1*, Claudia Osés Llanes2 and Rigoberto Fimia Duarte3

1Villa Clara Provincial Meteorological Center, Cuba
2Degree Specialist in Hygiene and Epidemiology, Subdirector of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Polyclinic, Cuba
3Faculty of Health Technology, University of Medical Sciences, Villa Clara Cuba
*Corresponding author: Ricardo Oses Rodriguez, Villa Clara Provincial Meteorological Center, Cuba E-mail:
Received: 20 October 2021 | Accepted: 28 October 2021 | Published: 30 October 2021
How to cite this article: Rodriguez RO, Llanes CO, Duarte RF. How the Chaos Theory is Defeated in the Yabu Meteorological Station, Cuba. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2021 Oct 30; 2(10): 1059-1066. doi: 10.37871/jbres1348, Article ID: jbres1348
Copyright:© 2021 Rodriguez RO, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.
Keywords
  • Forecast
  • Long term
  • Time
  • ROR model
  • Chaos

In this work, 8 weather variables were modeled at the Yabu meteorological station, Cuba, a daily database from the Yabu meteorological station, Cuba, of extreme temperatures, extreme humidity and their average value, precipitation, was used. The force of the wind and the cloudiness corresponding to the period from 1977 to 2021, a linear mathematical model is obtained through the methodology of Regressive Objective Regression (ROR) for each variable that explains their behavior, depending on these 15, 13, 10 and 8 years in advance. It is concluded that these models allow the long-term forecast of the weather, opening a new possibility for the forecast, concluding that the chaos in time can be overcome if this way of predicting is used, the calculation of the mean error regarding the forecast of persistence in temperatures, wind force and cloud cover, while the persistence model is better in humidity, this allows to have valuable information in the long term of the weather in a locality, which results in a better decision making in the different aspects of the economy and society that are impacted by the weather forecast. It is the first time that an ROR model has been applied to the weather forecast processes for a specific day 8, 10, 13 and 15 years in advance.

In different fields of study, models of cumulative growth over time play an important role, many researchers have contributed to the knowledge of relevant developed models. There are some non-linear models, the most common Gompertz, Weibull, negative exponential, Richard's model, logistic, mono-molecular, Brody, Mitcherlich, von Betalanffy, S-Shaped among others, etc. There are about 77 equations referring to sigmoidal growth models which are used in epidemics, bioassays, agriculture, engineering fields, diameter of trees, distribution of forest height [1]. Among the most widely used growth models are those of Gompertz, Richard and Weibull. Their formulas can be seen in detail in Ban Ghanim Al-Ani [2], in this work a detailed and brilliant mathematical description of them is made, although the Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) are large for non-linear models, These models were implemented in Covid-19, a new disease of which the behavior is known as time passes. Claudia was shown for the cases of Covid-19 in IRAQ that the ROR modeling gave better results than non-linear models, that is why for meteorological weather we will use this linear ROR model.

In our work we will develop a linear ROR model of 8 time variables, these are the extreme temperatures, maximum and minimum, the daily precipitation, the humidity, maximum and minimum, the daily average, the strength of the wind and the cloudiness and we will compare it with the persistence model, which is a good model obtained for weather forecasting, and we will demonstrate how it is possible to predict this on a certain day with enough time in advance that shows that chaos theory can be defeated if this way of predicting is used.

In an article about the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics, it is said verbatim about mathematical models for weather forecasting:

These models are based on the laws of physics and have been developed from models that were used to predict the weather. Weather is described by meteorological quantities such as temperature, precipitation, wind or clouds, and is affected by what happens in the oceans and on land. Climate models are based upon the weather’s calculated statistical properties, such as average values, standard deviations, highest and lowest measured values, etcetera. They cannot tell us what the weather will be in Stockholm on 10 December next year, but we can get some idea of what temperature or how much rainfall we can expect on average in Stockholm in December.

In this appointment the knowledge that until now is had of chaos and its impossibility of going beyond 10 days with the help of predictive weather models is evidenced, however according to Brigitte Boisselier, PhD in Physics, Professor of Biochemistry, Director of Clonaid ¨ When a relatively elderly, eminent and distinguished scientist declares that something is possible, he is probably right. When it coincides that something is impossible, there is a high probability that it is wrong.

We could not count on the history of the data from December 10 in Stockholm, however we have the data from Yabu station for that day through the years and it is with these data that we will prove that the long-term weather forecast for 1 This particular day is also possible with an acceptable margin of error, which shows that chaos can be overcome if this way of predicting is used.

For this work the data of 8 weather variables were used, these are the extreme temperatures, maximum and minimum, the daily precipitation, the maximum and minimum humidity, the daily average humidity, the strength of the wind and the cloudiness. The forecast was made with the use of the Regressive Objective Regression (ROR) methodology that has been implemented in different variables such as viruses that circulate in the province of Villa Clara and particularly in Covid-19 in Cuba [3-6]. A long-term forecast was made up to 15 years from December 10, 2020 to December 10, 2035.

In this linear ROR methodology, the dichotomous variables DS, DI and NoC must first be created, where: NoC: Number of base cases (its coefficient in the model represents the trend of the series). DS = 1, if NoC is odd; DI = 0, if NoC is even, and vice versa. DS represents a sawtooth function and DI this same function, but in an inverted way, in such a way that the variable to be modeled is trapped between these parameters and a large amount of variance is explained, a detailed explanation of it can be seen in [7]. In figure 1 the location of the meteorological stations of Villa Clara, Cuba.

Climate

General description: According to the Köppen classification (modified), in most of Cuba the predominant climate is of the warm tropical type, with a rainy season in the summer. In general, it is quite accepted to express that the climate of Cuba is tropical, seasonally humid, with maritime influence and semi-continental features, our province of Villa Clara also responds to these characteristics. As determining factors in the formation of the climate, the amount of solar radiation received, the particularities of the atmospheric circulation over the country, and the different influence of the physical-geographical characteristics of the territory are identified. Due to its geographical position, our city is located at a latitude very close to the Tropic of Cancer, which conditions the reception of high values ​​of solar radiation throughout the year, determining the warm character of its climate. In addition, it is located on the border between the zones of tropical and extratropical circulation, receiving the influence of both on a seasonal basis. In the season that goes approximately from November to April, weather and climate variations become more noticeable, with abrupt changes in daily weather, associated with the passage of frontal systems, the anticyclonic influence of continental origin and low centers. Extratropical pressures, from May to October, on the contrary, there are few variations over time, with the more or less marked influence of the North Atlantic Anticyclone. The most important changes are related to the presence of disturbances in the tropical circulation (eastern waves and tropical cyclones).

Everything was done with the help of the SPSS Statistical Package, Version 19, from the IBM company. The objective of this work is aimed at predicting long-term weather variables in El Yabú Cuba and thus defeating chaos theory.

In table 1, you can see the parameters of the models. The coefficients of the explained variance R are high, the errors of the models are small, the temperatures depend on the lags in 15 years the minimum and 13 years the maximum, the precipitation of 8 years ago, the minimum humidity of 10 years ago, the Wind force (FF) in 13 years ago and cloud cover in 15 years ago. In table 2, a summary of the linear ROR model obtained by variable, this explains 99.7% of the variance with an error of 2.41ºC, which is a small error considering that we are predicting the maximum daily temperature 13 years in advance. Table 3 shows the analysis of variance of the model, which is highly significant with a Fisher's F of 1350.6 significant at 100%. In table 4, it can be seen that all the variables are significant, the temperature trend is not significant and that is why it is not shown. The linear model depends on the data returned in 13 years (Lag13 Tmax). In figure 2 we can see that the residuals do not differ from a normal distribution with zero mean and 0.966 standard deviation. In figure 3, the modeling results can be seen that the predicted values ​​coincide with the real values ​​of the variable, the errors are very small, close to zero.

Table 1: Parameters of the models of different time variables in Yabú Cuba.
Variable R Error of the model Saw Tooth (DS) Inverted Saw Tooth (DI) Tend Delay
Coeficient
Fisher F
T Min 98.8 3.09 10.73 8.86   15
0.472
335
T max 99.7 2.41 51.08 49.93   13
-0.833
1350
Precip 100 0.0 -8 E(-16) -1.5E(-15) 2.98E(-17) 8
-5.8E (-17)
7.51i
HRx 100 1.92 96.44 96.11 0.041   36861
Hrn 98.7 9.80 77.99 73.77 -0.054 10
-0.333
277
Hrm 99.7 6.16 81.57 79.62 0.070   2490
FF 90.2 2.91 2.353 2.586 0.049 13
0.261
27.2
Nubosidad 92.4 1.55 2.98 2.634   15
0.496
32.2
Table 2: Model summaryc.d.
Model R R Squaredb R Squared adjusted Stándard error of estimation Durbin-Watson
1 0.997a 0.993 0.992 2.4144 2.503
a. Predictors: Log13Tmax. DS. DI
b. For the regression through the origin (the model without interception). R squared measures the proportion of the variability in the dependent variable on the origin explained by the regression. This cannot be compared to R squared for models that include intercept.
c. Dependent variable: Tmax
d. Linear regression through the origin
Table 3: ANOVAa.b.
Model Sum of Squares Df Quadratic mean F Sig.
  Regressión 23618.784 3 7872.928 1350.618 0.000c
Residuals 163.216 28 5.829    
Total 23782.000d 31      
a. Dependent variable: Tmax
b. Linear regression through the origin
c. Predictors: Lag13Tmax. DS. DI
d. This total sum of squares is not corrected for the constant because the constant is zero for the regression through the origin.
Table 4: Coefficientsa.b.
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
B Error standing Beta
  DS 51.079 6.010 1.283 8.499 .000
DI 49.939 5.930 1.295 8.422 .000
Log13Tmax -.833 .216 -.831 -3.864 .001
a. Dependent variable: Tmax
b. Linear regression through the origin

As in extreme temperatures no trend was observed, we can affirm that on December 10 throughout history there is no cooling or warming trend, which does not mean that for some other day in particular from the daily data series there may be a significant trend. The forecast 13 years in advance is shown in table 5, it can be seen that December 10 will present days with high and less high maximum temperatures. It is the first time that an ROR model has been applied to the long-term forecast of the weather in Cuba 13 years in advance for a specific day, as this had been done for climatic variables such as the dumping of sand on Varadero Beach with good results (Oses et al 2021), also for electricity consumption in the province [8,9] in addition, in other works the number of people is also modeled in the long term with cerebrovascular accidents, models the atmospheric pressure and its impact on the density of mosquitoes well in advance. Another long-term model was enthroned in Sancti Spiritus Cuba where a forecast of daily variables is made one year in advance using the ROR regression [10]. Table 6 shows the results of the errors taking an independent sample of 11 cases from 2010 to 2021 to see how the model works in an independent sample of 25% of the cases. As can be seen, the errors are small for all the variables as well as the standard deviations of the variables. The results of the forecast for the rest of the weather variables in Yabu, Cuba will be shown in figures 4-10.

Table 5: Case summary.
  Yeari Month Day Maximun Temperature(Tmax) Unstandardized Predicted Value Unstandardized Residual
1 1977 12 10 29.0 . .
2 1978 12 10 28.6 . .
3 1979 12 10 26.8 . .
4 1980 12 10 28.7 . .
5 1981 12 10 23.8 . .
6 1982 12 10 26.9 . .
7 1983 12 10 27.7 . .
8 1984 12 10 26.4 . .
9 1985 12 10 28.2 . .
10 1986 12 10 30.8 . .
11 1987 12 10 26.2 . .
12 1988 12 10 27.0 . .
13 1989 12 10 24.2 . .
14 1990 12 10 23.9 25.77404 -1.87404
15 1991 12 10 27.5 27.24671 .25329
16 1992 12 10 29.0 27.60726 1.39274
17 1993 12 10 28.1 27.16338 .93662
18 1994 12 10 29.4 30.10712 -.70712
19 1995 12 10 28.3 28.66329 -.36329
20 1996 12 10 23.1 26.85731 -3.75731
21 1997 12 10 30.6 29.07994 1.52006
22 1998 12 10 25.6 26.44067 -.84067
23 1999 12 10 25.2 25.41348 -.21348
24 2000 12 10 28.9 28.10724 .79276
25 2001 12 10 28.7 28.57996 .12004
26 2002 12 10 30.2 29.77380 .42620
27 2003 12 10 26.8 31.16315 -4.36315
28 2004 12 10 30.7 27.02397 3.67603
29 2005 12 10 28.7 26.91340 1.78660
30 2006 12 10 26.6 26.52399 .07601
31 2007 12 10 27.9 26.58008 1.31992
32 2008 12 10 29.0 26.35734 2.64266
33 2009 12 10 32.4 31.82978 .57022
34 2010 12 10 25.5 24.44078 1.05922
35 2011 12 10 27.7 29.74656 -2.04656
36 2012 12 10 30.7 28.94052 1.75948
37 2013 12 10 29.7 26.99672 2.70328
38 2014 12 10 21.1 26.02402 -4.92402
39 2015 12 10 26.6 25.91345 .68655
40 2016 12 10 29.0 27.60726 1.39274
41 2017 12 10 20.4 25.49681 -5.09681
42 2018 12 10 28.6 26.02402 2.57598
43 2019 12 10 31.1 28.91328 2.18672
44 2020 12 10 23.0 26.69065 -3.69065
45 2021 12 10 . 26.91340 .
46 2022 12 10 . 22.94087 .
47 2023 12 10 . 29.82989 .
48 2024 12 10 . 26.85731 .
49 2025 12 10 . 25.49681 .
50 2026 12 10 . 25.19074 .
51 2027 12 10 . 33.49634 .
52 2028 12 10 . 27.77392 .
53 2029 12 10 . 26.91340 .
54 2030 12 10 . 32.94029 .
55 2031 12 10 . 27.24671 .
56 2032 12 10 . 24.02414 .
57 2033 12 10 . 31.91310 .
58 2034 12 10 . . .
59 2035 12 10 . . .
60 2036 12 10 . . .
61 2037 12 10 . . .
62 2038 12 10 . . .
63 2039 12 10 . . .
64 2040 12 10 . . .
Total N 64 64 64 44 44 31
a. Limited to the first 100 cases.
Table 6: Mean errors of the time variables for an independent sample of 11 cases starting in 2010.
  N Mínimal Máximal Media Deviation Standing
eTmin.mi 11 -7.82 3.89 -1.1261 4.12549
eTmax.mi 11 -5.10 2.70 -.3086 3.03874
er24h.mi 11 .00 .00 .0000 .00000
eFFmed.mi 11 -4.23 4.83 .1066 2.84084
eHrmax.mi 11 -4.65 2.51 -.1206 1.92130
eHrmin.mi 11 -8.74 12.10 .5386 7.09060
eHrmed.mi 11 -8.28 6.97 .3082 5.00155
eNmed.mi 10 -1.87 1.81 -.1527 1.34801
N válid (per list) 10        

Finally, the improvement index of one model over another was calculated as follows, which is nothing more than the modeling SKILL.

Here a slight modification was made to the formula [11-14] by adding the mean instead of the mean squared error (MSE) according to the original formula, obtaining that the established model is the persistence model and the model to be checked is the ROR, this was done in the independent sample of 11 cases in table 7.

Table 7: Sample.
Variable Error ROR Error Persistency Improvement (%)
Temperature Minimun (T Min). -1.1261 -1.3175 14.5
Temperature Máximum (T max) -0.3086 -0.7757 60.2
                               Precipitation 0.000 0.000 -
Maximum Relative Humidity (HRx) -0.1206 -0.1105 *
Mínimum Relative Humidity (Hrn) 0.5386 0.5250 *
Mean Relative Humidity (Hrm) 0.3082 0.2002 *
Mean velocity of wind (FF) 0.1066 0.1786 40.31
Cloudiness -0.1527 -0.3736 59.12

SKILL_SCORE=1( Media_Modelo_a_comprobar Media_Modelo_establecido ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@6F34@

The improvement ranges from 14.5% in the minimum temperature to 60.2% in the maximum, so we can affirm that in this case a linear ROR model exceeds a persistence model in most of the variables studied except for humidities where persistence exceeds to the ROR model by a narrow margin.

The coefficients of the explained variance R are high, the errors of the models small, the temperatures depend on the delays in 15 years the minimum and 13 years the maximum, the precipitation of 8 years ago, the minimum humidity of 10 years ago, the Wind force (FF) in 13 years ago and cloud cover in 15 years ago.

Depending on the meteorological variable studied, which shows that what will happen in a day can be predicted well in advance, thus defeating the chaos in the weather forecast. In the independent sample of 11 years the errors are small for all the variables as well as the standard deviations of the variables. The improvement ranges from 14.5% in the minimum temperature to 60.2% in the maximum, so we can affirm that in this case a linear ROR model exceeds a persistence model in most of the variables studied except for humidities where persistence exceeds to the ROR model by a narrow margin. It is the first time that an ROR model has been applied to the weather forecast processes for a specific day 8, 10, 13 and 15 years in advance.

We would like to thank the Villa Clara Cuba Provincial Meteorological Center for providing the computing resources without which this work would not have been possible, as well as Arch. Odalys D. Llanes Concepcion for editing the document.

  1. Dagogo J, Nduka EC, Ogoke. Comparative analysis of richards, gompertz and weibull models. IOSR Journal of Mathematics. 2020;16(1):15-20. https://tinyurl.com/nkxffwz6
  2. Ghanim AA. Statistical modeling of the novel COVID-19 epidemic in Iraq. Epidemiologic Methods. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/4k6tsuxt
  3. Álvarez ML, Rodríguez R, Fimia DR, Rodríguez BC, Iannacone J, Zaita F. The regressive objective regression is more than just a blanket for viruses circulating in the province of Villa Clara, Cuba. The Biologist. 2017;15:127.
  4. Rodríguez, Llanes, Duarte, Meneses, Iannacone, Santos, Wilford G. Age prediction for covid-19 suspects and contacts in villa clara province, cuba age prediction. 2021;6(4):41-51. https://tinyurl.com/fr3js658
  5. Rodríguez, Duarte, Llanes, Gavilanes, Zambrano, González M. Forecast of new and deceased cases of covid-19 in cuba with an advance of 105 days. Acta Scientific Sciences. 2021;3(7):31-36. https://tinyurl.com/9km24scs
  6. Rodriguez, Martinez. Mathematical modeling and forecast 11 years in advance of the dumping of sand in varadero beach, cuba, using the regressive objective regression (ROR) methodology. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology. 2021;3(1):1-3. https://tinyurl.com/4j7789k6
  7. Fimia RD, Rodríguez RO, González, Contreras M, Martín M. The killer whale entomaphones and copepods of biological control alternatives have mathematical modeling in Cuba's central provinces. Anales de la Academia de Ciencias de Cuba. 2020;10(3).
  8. Rodríguez, Fernández, González, Duarte. Studio of provincial provincial electric consumption of villa clara and its province 2019-2023 cuba. Scientific Review of Renewable Energy Resources. 2018.
  9. Ricardo Oses Rodríguez, Humberto Machado Fernández, González, Duarte. Studio of electric consumption of cala of villa clara and its prostitutional diario in largo plazo 2019-2020. Cuba. Scientific review of renewable energy sources. 2019.
  10. Rodríguez, Duarte, González, Martínez, Cabrera, Padrón. Long term forecast of meteorological variables in sancti spiritus. Cuba applied ecology and environmental sciences. 2014;2(1):37-42. https://tinyurl.com/y8cxhhtr
  11. Wilks SD. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. An introduction. International Geophysics Series. 1987;59:255- 256. https://tinyurl.com/2b7h32pn
  12. Rodríguez, Freyre, Duarte, Llanes, Aleman, Gálvez, Martinez, Marrero. Modulatión of the quantity of deceased and revenues for stroke in sagua la grande, villa clara, cuba. Impact of the climate. 2019;7(2).
  13. Duarte, Rodríguez, Elbal, Wilfrido Cárdenas, Boffill, Pedro. In function of mathematical modeling and atmospheric pressure in villa clara, cuba. Revista De La Facultad De Medicina De La Universidad Nacional De Colombia. 2020.
  14. Llanes CO, Rodríguez RO, Duarte RF, Gavilanes MPZ, Wilford. Comparison of linear ROR vs non linear weibull model for COVID-19 in Iraq. HJAMR. 2020;2(5). https://tinyurl.com/a8yzmkz

✨ Call for Preprints Submissions

Are you the author of a recent Preprint? We invite you to submit your manuscript for peer-reviewed publication in our open access journal.
Benefit from fast review, global visibility, and exclusive APC discounts.

Submit Now   Archive
?